Site Map

 

RECENT REPORTS OF SUCCESS RATES FOR SURGICAL TREATMENT OF AF (MAY 2007)

 

Here is a summary of some recent reports on surgery for atrial fibrillation from the AATS Convention in Washington DC in May 2007. Its purpose is to give you an very general idea of the outcomes to be expected from surgical approaches. Details such as subject characteristics, invasiveness,  lesions sets and whether they were done as "stand-alone" or concomitant procedures are left out.  Remember that rates for surgeons will vary, so you should always get data on success- and complication rates for the surgeon you are considering -- for your type of AF and physical status,  taking into account the way success is measured and length of follow-up (see the af-ideas.com web site for more on choosing a treatment for your AF and  selecting a surgeon or EP to do it).

 

Not every well-known surgeon was at the convention. Absent were such notables Dr Dale Geiss and Dr Patrick McCarthy, both of whom reportedly have excellent success rates.

 

Surgeons treating AF are obviously keeping track of the accomplishments of their EP colleagues, as evidenced by the title of one of the presentations by Ralph Damiano, entitled "Surgery for Lone Atrial Fibrillation: How do we become competitive with catheter ablation?". They are working hard  to develop approaches that are less invasive while retaining the potentially excellent success rates of the Maze procedure.

 

You will notice that the follow-up periods, with one exception, are very short. Several presenters stressed that what is needed are long-term, randomized studies on various techniques on large groups of patients differing on characteristics that affect prognosis.

 

The first section presents rates from two top Catheter Ablation ("CA") centers for comparison purposes. This is followed by a section on surgical outcomes. At the end is a brief description of the criteria for recommending surgery vs. CA provided by Dr Niv Ad.

 

(For additional information on techniques and success rates, see 2008 reviews by Voeller and Gillanov .)

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Catheter Ablation Success-Rate Examples

 

  EP

        CA Type

             Subjects

               Success Rate

           Complication %

   Follow-Up

 

Natale

et al (CCF)

PV antrum+other lesions

 based on experience in a large volume center (836 cases in 2004 )

87%(1st CA);95%(after 2nd CA); off meds

         NA

   3 mos

 

EP

        CA Type

             Subjects

              Success Rate

        Complication %

   Follow-Up

 

Haissaguerre & Jais (Bordeaux)

   PVI + numerous Maze-like lesions

       60 Ss (all CAF)

   87%(1st CA) 95%(after 2nd CA)

off meds

  .016% (LAA disconnection was created in one S)

   11 months

Please note the short follow-up periods.     Here are results from a world-wide survey of cases between 2003 and 2006:

 

"Of 16,309 patients with full disclosure of outcome data, 10,488 (median 70.0%; interquartile range 57,7% - 75.4%) became asymptomatic without anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) and another 2,047 (10.0%; 0.5% - 17.1%) became asymptomatic in the presence of previously ineffective AADs over 18 (range, 3 - 24) months follow up. Success rates free of AADs and overall success rates were significantly larger in 9,590 patients with paroxysmal AF (74.9% and 83.2%) than in 2,800 patients with persistent AF (64.8% and 75.0%) and 1,108 patients with long-lasting AF (63.1% and 72.3%) (p < 0.0001). Major complications were reported in 741 patients (4.5%)."

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Surgery Success-Rate Examples

 

PAF=Paroxysmal/Intermittent AF;    

CAF=Permanent/Persistent/Continuous AF;   

FU=Follow-up; NA=not available;

PVI=Pulmonary vein isolation

 

If the % of Ss that are off medications or other information is not indicated, it was not reported. (Of course being off medication rate is very important to most prospective patients...)

 

For more on the lesion sets of the following surgeons, see Lesion Set Examples.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

These two reports on the Cox Maze III are presented for the purposes of comparison with newer modifications and other "minimaze" approaches.

Surgeon

      Surgery

     Subjects

          Success Rate

     Complication %

   Follow-Up

 

James L Cox

2003

   Cox Maze  III

 (cut-and-sew) 

        112 Ss

     64% PAF 36% CAF 

  92% (80% off meds)

         10%

    5.5 yrs;self report

http://jtcs.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/full/126/6/1822

 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Surgeon

              Surgery

      Subjects

       Success Rate

        Complication %

   Follow-Up

Gillanov* report of Cox data (date unknown)

 Cox Maze III

           346 Ss

 99% (97% off meds)

no difference between PAF and CAF

    NA

         NA

 

*Dr Gillanov is a well-known surgeon from the Cleveland Clinic (CCF).    Here are rates from a descriptive article he wrote for patients at the CCF web site:

 

"The Maze procedure has been very successful with a 98% success rate in "lone AF" patients and a 90% success rate overall. Post procedure freedom from stroke has been over 90%."

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Here are the reports from the AATS Convention:

 

Presenter

  Surgery

Subjects

          Success Rate

    Complication %

   Follow-Up

Ralph Damiano

 

Cox Maze IV

 209 Ss

64% PAF 36% CAF

      95%(69% off meds)

          NA

 11 months

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Presenter

   Surgery

       Subjects

        Success Rate

       Complication %

   Follow-Up

Niv Ad

 Minimally invasive

cryosurgical Maze

 31 Ss (100% CAF)

  93%

10%***

 1 yr

***This is a high percentage of complications. It must be noted that: 1) Some other presenters did not report complications; and, 2) This sample was very small. The complications reported by Dr Ad are: One re-operation for bleeding, and two permanent pacemakers .

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Presenter

              Surgery

         Subjects

   Success Rate

       Complication %

   Follow-Up

Groh MA

HIFU energy PV-antrum & LA isthmus lesions

   100 Ss

 100%(PAF) 85 %(PAF)

      0% "device-related"

 6 months

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

PVI-Centered "Minimazes"

 

Presenter                      

              Surgery

           Subjects

   Success Rate

 Complication %

   Follow-Up

Pruitt JC 2006

  Box-type type PVI using  microwave energy source**

 100 Ss

64% PAF 36%CAF

 30%

 c. 3%

 36 months

 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Presenter

 Surgery            

       Subjects

   Success Rate

      Complication %

   Follow-Up

Randall Wolf

 Wolf Minimaze

      23 Ss

 94%(PAF) 87%(CAF)

            NA

 2 yrs (self-report & ECG)

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Presenter

       Surgery

      Subjects

 Success Rate

                Complication %

   Follow-Up

Edgerton JR

 Wolf Minimaze+Dallas Extended Lesion Set

 47 Ss

 93%(PAF) 67%(CAF)

 NA

 6 months

(continuous monitoring)

 

Several other surgeons are offering the TT (Totally Thoracoscopic) MiniMaze operations. They are: Dr James LongoriaDr John Sirak;

Dr John Pigott; and Dr Bryan Steinberg _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

This "hybrid" (or "convergent") approach combining epicardial Wolf-type surgery with a CA as needed was not presented at the 2007 AATS meetings, but  should be included in this list

Surgeon      

            Surgery

    Subjects

   Success   Rate

   Complication %

   Follow-Up

Richard Lee

 Wolf Minimaze + CA as needed after one month

 100+ Ss

 90+%(PAF) 50-70%(CAF)

 NA

 6 months

http://www.nmh.org/nmh/heart/inthenews.htm?year=2008&cid=2522

 

Both Dr Andrea Natale  and Dr Andy Kiser are exploring similar "convergent" procedures", in which surgery and a CA are done with the CA immediately following the surgery.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

This new epicardial approach was not presented at AATS, but may be of some interest because of its ambitious steps for maximizing the probability of success by specifying restrictive endpoints, because of the use of a new instrument for making lesions, and because of the pattern of lesions. The "comprehensive bi-atrial lesion pattern" is designed to be as effective as the Cox III Maze using a different pattern of lesions*:

 

Surgeon

 Surgery

      Subjects

 Success Rate

        Complication %

   Follow-Up

Kiser Andy C et al

Ex-Maze

   30 Ss(4 PAF,26 CAF)

 73%

     NA

    3 months

 

http://www.ex-maze.com/

 

*Please see here for some negative comments by Dr James Cox. Apparently, Dr Kiser has turned his interest to the convergent procedure, as above.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________